During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
// 原因：先处理右侧元素（含循环部分），把结果存在栈里，供左侧元素直接使用
。关于这个话题，夫子提供了深入分析
當被問及代表美國參賽的意義時，赫斯坦言：「這有點困難。僅因我披著國旗，並不代表我認同美國正在發生的所有事情。」。safew官方下载对此有专业解读
«Безумие, что эта война продолжается», — посетовал Трамп.，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
Екатерина Ештокина